Submission Details

Submitter:

Classification:
Refuted Evidence
GENCC:100006
Gene:
Disease:
monogenic diabetes
Mode Of Inheritance:
Autosomal dominant
Evaluated Date:
01/17/2023
Evidence/Notes:

BLK: monogenic diabetes, autosomal dominant (MONDO: 0015967)

Refuted

BLK was first reported in relation to autosomal dominant monogenic diabetes in 2009 (Borowiec et al., PMID: 19667185). Evidence describing this gene-disease relationship includes case-level data (1.1 points), segregation data (0.5 points), case-control data (0 points), and experimental data (1 point). Summary of case-level and experimental data: 2.6 points.

Variants in this gene have been reported in at least 6 probands in 3 publications (PMIDs: 19667185, 28095440, 31638168). Variants segregated with disease in 22 additional family members in the initial report (PMID: 19667185). Importantly, the families in the paper were selected for prior linkage to the 8q23 region that contains BLK. While a total of 723 kb in this region was sequenced in these families, attribution of the variant-disease segregation to linkage with an untyped variant in another gene cannot be ruled out and seems particularly likely in the family segregating variants too common for the disease, including p.Ala71Thr (rs55758736) described in the proceeding paragraph. In 2 probands in a later publication (PMID 31638168), the BLK variants were unlikely to be causal because there was an alternate and more likely molecular cause.

The BLK variant p.Ala71Thr, the first coding variant to be implicated in MODY (PMID: 19667185), was studied in three large type 2 diabetes (T2D) case-control cohorts and while found to be nominally associated with the polygenic disease T2D (OR = 1.47, p = 0.035) in 4,901 T2D cases and 4,280 controls, especially in the setting of obesity (OR = 2.44, p = 0.004), was found in 52 normoglycemic controls, providing strong evidence against being causal for monogenic diabetes (PMID 23224494). In addition, the p. Ala71Thr variant has a high allele frequency in gnomAD 2.1 (e.g., MAF = 0.012 in European non-Finnish and 0.04 in Africans), much higher than expected for MODY. The p.Ala71Thr variant was not associated with T2D in the AMP T2D Knowledge Portal (type2diabetesgenetics.org), though a common (MAF = 0.50) intronic BLK variant was modestly but GWAS significantly associated with T2D in the DIAMANTE Study (OR = 1.04, p = 6 x 10-10) in the Portal. The four noncoding variants reported by Borowiec et al. have allele counts ranging from 0 to 2 in gnomAD. The noncoding variants were associated with a 60-80% reduction in luciferase expression, and the Ala71Thr variant abolished expression of Pdx1 and Nkx6.1 in MIN6 mouse insulinoma cells (PMID:19667185).

Laver et al (PMID: 35108381) reported a lack of enrichment of ultra-rare (MAF<6X10-6) protein-truncating and missense variants in BLK, PAX4, and KLF11 in a large cohort of cases with suspected MODY (n=1227) compared to population cohort (UK Biobank =185,898), gnomADv2 and gnomADv3. They also showed a similar lack of enrichment of any protein-truncating variants in BLK, PAX4, and KLF11 in the MODY cohort. While there is evidence for a gene-disease association between BLK and diabetes in the form of expression studies and in vitro functional assays, very little convincing case-level evidence for involvement in monogenic diabetes has accumulated since BLK was first proposed as a MODY gene. Moreover, some of the originally implicated variants have proven to be too common in the general population and normoglycemic individuals to be implicated in monogenic diabetes. Finally, the high prevalence of BLK LoF variants in the general population and lack of over-representation of rare BLK variants in a monogenic diabetes cohort argue strongly against a causal role of BLK in monogenic diabetes. In summary, there is limited evidence to support this gene-disease relationship. There appears to be strong evidence to contradict the BLK-monogenic diabetes gene-disease relationship that warrants refuting the association (originally asserted as maturity-onset diabetes of the young 11, MODY11, MIM: 613375). As described above, BLK variants may play a role in polygenic type 2 diabetes (MIM: 125853); this relationship will not be curated at this time since the contribution would be in the form of common variants with a small effect.

In addition to its proposed role in monogenic and type 2 diabetes, BLK has been proposed as a possible causal gene in antibody deficiency. The BLK (B lymphocyte kinase) gene encodes a Src family tyrosine kinase, which plays a role in B cell receptor signaling (BCR) and B cell development. A rare heterozygous missense variant in BLK, p.Leu3Pro has been reported in 2015 in 2 related common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) patients, but not other healthy family members (Compeer et al, PMID: 25926555). The index patient had a history of severe recurrent pulmonary infections from infancy and further evaluation demonstrated hypogammaglobulinemia (low IgG, IgA, close to normal IgM) and impaired vaccine antibody responses. The patient had a small reduction in peripheral B cells and IgG switched memory B cells were low normal, but IgA and IgM-memory B cells were significantly decreased. The patient had no autoimmunity or lymphoproliferation. The patient’s father who had the variant was also symptomatic. Functional studies were performed with transformed B cell lines overexpressing the mutant, which suggested a functional impact of this variant in terms of BCR-mediated antigen presentation to antigen-specific T cells, and alteration in BCR endosomal routing on antigen binding. The variant-expressing cell line also showed reduction in the ability to transmit tonic and ligand-induced BCR signals (PMID: 25926555). In mouse models it has been shown that Blk is not essential for murine B cell development and activation (Texeido G et al, 2000PMID: 10648608,). Therefore, the association between BLK gene variants and an antibody deficiency is limited, at best, and requires further patients as well as functional studies for a definitive correlation.

PubMed IDs:
19667185 23224494 28095440 31638168
Public Report:
Assertion Criteria:
Submitter Submitted Date:
12/05/2025

The GenCC data are available free of restriction under a CC0 1.0 Universal (CC0 1.0) Public Domain Dedication. The GenCC requests that you give attribution to GenCC and the contributing sources whenever possible and appropriate. The accepted Flagship manuscript is now available from Genetics in Medicine (https://www.gimjournal.org/article/S1098-3600(22)00746-8/fulltext).

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. The GenCC does not independently verify the submitted information. Though the information is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, no warranty, expressed or implied, is made regarding accuracy, adequacy, completeness, reliability or usefulness of any information. This disclaimer applies to both isolated and aggregate uses of the information. The information is provided on an "as is" basis, collected through periodic submission and therefore may not represent the most up-to-date information from the submitters. If you have questions about the medical relevance of information contained on this website, please see a healthcare professional; if you have questions about specific gene-disease claims, please contact the relevant sources; and if you have questions about the representation of the data on this website, please contact gencc@thegencc.org.